Friday, February 22, 2013

Simon's Oscar Preview 2013: Best Picture

This week's schedule:
Monday - Art & Design, Music
Tuesday - Technical Achievements
Wednesday - Short Films, Special Feature Films
Thursday - Writing & Directing, Acting
Friday - Best Picture

Alright, all the warm-up categories are done and we're on to the main event. We've got nine Best Picture nominees and only one of them will be winning on Sunday. Let's see what we've got...

AMOUR
Why It Might Win: Amour dramatically outperformed people's expectations when it came to nominations. With the Academy giving it five nods, including four in major categories, there's no way we can't take Amour seriously. It also happens to be an incredible film, tracking the slow disintegration of a human life in its waning years. Director Michael Haneke has long been making powerful cinema, but his style is decidedly European and he's never gained any traction with mainstream America. If the Academy wants to make a gesture towards the international community, an Amour win would do the trick.

ARGO
Why It Might Win: The Critics' Choice Awards. The Golden Globes. The Screen Actors Guild Awards. The Producers Guild Awards. The Directors Guild Awards. The British Academy Film Awards. All of these ceremonies have ended in a win for Argo, Ben Affleck's gripping film about the Iran hostage crisis. Even last year's The Artist didn't have this much snowball power behind it, since it lost at the SAG Awards. Yet, without that crucial nomination for Affleck in Best Director, Argo has to do something that hasn't been done since 1989: win Best Picture without having its director nominated. Is the Academy willing to break so far away from the rest of the film industry on this one?

BEASTS OF THE SOUTHERN WILD
Why It Might Win: Like Amour, Beasts of the Southern Wild stunned everyone by raking in some key nominations when the announcement came out. Nine-year-old Quvenzhané Wallis is a wonderfully fun (and deserving) nomination in Best Actress, but Benh Zeitlin's nod in Best Director shows that the Academy voters are considerable more fond of this movie than we may have previously released. The Oscars have flirted with the independent cinema community over the last few years and maybe Beasts will be the beneficiary of that growing relationship. The chances aren't great, but Beasts has all the pieces (and appropriate nominations) to be a real Best Picture contender.

DJANGO UNCHAINED
Why It Might Win: Seriously, though, can you imagine how awesome it would be if Django Unchained took home the big award? A movie full of razor-sharp social commentary and cynicism, filtered through Quentin Tarantino's unique lens of violence and provocation...  yeah, totally sounds like a Best Picture winner to me. Joking aside, Django is the latest film that shows Tarantino's continuing growth as a writer, filmmaker and overall artist. One of these days, they're gonna have to give the man something, or else his next revenge epic might feature a pile of dead movie critics after the credits roll.

LES MISÉRABLES
Why It Might Win: It's big, it's loud, it's full of people crying while cameras get uncomfortably close to their faces! It's Les Mis! Tom Hooper's overcooked adaptation of the absurdly popular stage musical certainly has the pedigree to win piles and piles of awards, yet it has gained little traction with anyone other than actual movie-goes. A vote for Les Mis would be a vote for populism, making the hordes of weepy viewers and fanatical musical theater loyalists very, very happy. Which is a good thing... right? Hmm. Expect Les Mis to do very well in the big montages the Academy throws all over the award show, but not as well in the actual awards.


LIFE OF PI
Why It Might Win: While it doesn't get talked about to the same degree as Argo or Lincoln, Life of Pi is quietly sitting as one of the most acclaimed films of the year. Much of its excellence lies in its technical advancements, which are truly glorious and will surely clean up in the first hour of the show. No acting nomination for the underrated Suraj Sharma hurts it considerably, but Ang Lee is very much a contender in the up-for-grabs Best Director field. In this confused year at the Oscars, Life of Pi stands to potentially swoop in for a surprising win.

LINCOLN
Why It Might Win: Lincoln feels like it was genetically engineered to win Oscars. Spielberg. Day-Lews. Field. Jones. Kushner. These are famous names, associated with top-tier excellence in their respective crafts. Sure enough, Lincoln is an overwhelmingly well-crafted movie, with everyone hitting the highs we'd expect from that insane collection of names (and we haven't even delved into the film's incredibly supporting cast). Yet, despite all this pedigree, Lincoln has yet to beat Argo in any of the major award shows. The Oscars are its last and best bet. It's the kind of the film the Academy historically loves, but it's possible the times have changed too much. Sometimes, being merely great isn't enough.

SILVER LININGS PLAYBOOK
Why It Might Win: A comedy won Best Picture last year, opening the door for more films about actual happy things to win more Academy Awards. Silver Linings Playbook is certainly the most cheerful of the nine nominees and it's packed with surprising, powerful performances. It's one of those acting-and-writing showcases that seem to fall out of favor now and again, but still have a great deal of power when executed correctly. Jennifer Lawrence is the not-so-secret weapon here, but Bradley Cooper and Robert De Niro actually deserve their nominations as well. Director David O. Russell has learned how to play Hollywood's game. Could a Best Picture win be his reward for good behavior?

ZERO DARK THIRTY
Why It Might Win: If there was any justice in this world, Zero Dark Thirty would at least be in the conversation. Instead, a group of asinine Academy voters have spent the past two months trying to blacklist the movie from the awards entirely. They succeeded in getting Kathryn Bigelow shoved out of a Director nomination and now the film is left scrounging for scraps. It's all such a pity, since the film itself is incredible. The mainstream press seems to have misunderstood the movie entirely, ignoring the questions Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal are asking and instead spewing out a line of political platitudes, trying to distance America from its history with torture. Zero Dark Thirty has been shamed into silence, but that doesn't make it any less of a great film. A victory here would mean so much, not only to me personally but to the cinema industry (and America) as a whole.

My predictions should be obvious, but in case you want things spelled out for you...

Who Will Win: Argo
Who Should Win: Zero Dark Thirty

Argo is the strong favorite, but it comes with some tricky hurdles to jump. The 85th Academy Awards will reveal a lot about the current voting base. It seems as if the group is being pulled in several directions at once, resulting in the confused and messy nominations we saw this year. Hopefully, my predictions will stand. None of us are really sure what the voters are gonna do this year and the only way we can know is by watching the show on Sunday. Do your worst, Academy.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Simon's Oscar Preview 2013: Acting

This week's schedule:
Monday - Art & Design, Music
Tuesday - Technical Achievements
Wednesday - Short Films, Special Feature Films
Thursday - Writing & Directing, Acting
Friday - Best Picture

Films I haven't seen are marked accordingly.

ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE
Nominees: Jessica Chastain - Zero Dark Thirty, Jennifer Lawrence - Silver Linings Playbook, Emmanuelle Riva - Amour, Quvenzhané Wallis - Beasts of the Southern Wild, Naomi Watts - The Impossible

Who Will Win: Jennifer Lawrence
Who Should Win: Jessica Chastain

This is the category that I feel is the hardest to predict. It's a varied and, for the most part, entirely deserving group of performances. Chastain won at the Critics' Choice Awards and at the Globes. Lawrence also won at the Globes, along with the SAG Awards. Riva won at the BAFTAs and is seen as a very real dark horse contender by many observers and insiders. I think any of them are reasonable bets, although I think Riva is the least likely of the three. I'm choosing to believe that the informal blacklisting of Zero Dark Thirty from the awards will really hurt Chastain here. Silver Linings Playbook is also unlikely to win anything else and Lawrence certainly gives an amazing performance. Your guess is as good as mine.

ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE
Nominees: Bradley Cooper - Silver Linings Playbook, Daniel Day-Lewis - Lincoln, Hugh Jackman - Les Misérables, Joaquin Phoenix - The Master, Denzel Washington - Flight

Who Will Win: Daniel Day-Lewis
Who Should Win: Daniel Day-Lewis

Much, much easier to predict. Not only has Day-Lewis won all the awards leading up to the Oscars, he also happens to be DANIEL FRICKIN' DAY-LEWIS! He's an unstoppable force of nature. Even if Lincoln isn't a slam-dunk great film, no one can argue that the central performance is anything less than superb. The man is just unreal. He'll win his third Best Actor award and no one should be complaining about it. After Sunday, he'll go back into hibernation for five years, before emerging from his chrysalis and stunning us all again with complete mastery of his craft.

ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Nominees: Amy Adams - The Master, Sally Field - Lincoln, Anne Hathaway - Les Misérables, Helen Hunt - The Sessions, Jacki Weaver - Silver Linings Playbook

Who Will Win: Anne Hathaway
Who Should Win: Amy Adams

If anything, this category is even easier to predict than Best Actor. This is Hathaway's award, entirely and completely. She's won literally ever single major lead up award and the performance in question is quite remarkable. I will be sad to see Amy Adams get snubbed, though. The woman has been up for Supporting Actress four times now and her work in The Master is likely her best yet. It's a tricky role, that seems very hard to effectively portray and Adams totally nails it. Hathaway will win for essentially singing a song, albeit a tremendously powerful song. Let's just not pretend there aren't other deserving nominees here.

ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Nominees: Alan Arkin - Argo, Robert De Niro - Silver Linings Playbook, Philip Seymour Hoffman - The Master, Tommy Lee Jones - Lincoln, Christoph Waltz - Django Unchained

Who Will Win: Christoph Waltz
Who Should Win: Philip Seymour Hoffman

Not unlike Best Actress, I would not be surprised to be wrong here. De Niro, Hoffman, Jones and Waltz all have very real cases to be made, either based on performances, previous awards or overall Oscar politics. In my mind, the competition is boiling down to Waltz or Jones. Waltz won at the Golden Globes and the BAFTAs, while Jones has the SAG Awards in his corner. If Lincoln is looking at a Best Picture win, we might see Jones get swept up in that wave. For the time being, though, I'm guessing that Waltz will take home his second Oscar. 

Simon's Oscar Preview 2013: Writing & Directing

This week's schedule:
Monday - Art & Design, Music
Tuesday - Technical Achievements
Wednesday - Short Films, Special Feature Films
Thursday - Writing & Directing, Acting
Friday - Best Picture

Films I haven't seen are marked accordingly.

WRITING (ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY)
Nominees: Amour, Django Unchained, Flight, Moonrise Kingdom, Zero Dark Thirty

Who Will Win: Django Unchained
Who Should Win: Zero Dark Thirty

What an amazing year for original screenplays. Four of the five nominated films deserve the attention (sorry Flight), while The Master, Looper and The Cabin in the Woods lurk out of sight. Despite this wealth of excellence, Quentin Tarantino has gained near unstoppable momentum for the Django Unchained screenplay, wracking up awards at the Golden Globes, Critics' Choice and BAFTA ceremonies. Only the Writers Guild broke ranks, rewarding the deeply deserving Mark Boal for Zero Dark Thirty. I don't expect the Academy to be as reasonable. Tarantino hasn't won at the Oscars since Pulp Fiction, so I'm sure some people feel he's overdue. Make no mistake, Django is an amazing script, but in a category this deep, several people are going to get snubbed and it saddens me that Boal will be one of them.

WRITING (ADAPTED SCREENPLAY)
Nominees: Argo, Beasts of the Southern Wild, Life of Pi, Lincoln, Silver Linings Playbook

Who Will Win: Argo
Who Should Win: Lincoln

I'm very excited to watch this category on Sunday. If Argo is headed towards a Best Picture victory, it needs Chris Terrio to win for Adapted Screenplay. Since the creation of the supporting acting categories, only one film (1940's Rebecca) has won Best Picture without also winning an award for acting, directing or writing. Ben Affleck didn't get nominated for directing and Alan Arkin's chances in Supporting Actor look grim, so Terrio's screenplay is the best option. The Academy voters have watched every other major award ceremony pile the awards on Argo, so unless they want to go against the steam entirely, they have to do something to build up the hype as the night goes on. Terrio's win at the Writers Guild Awards seems huge here.

DIRECTING
Nominees: Michael Haneke - Amour, Ang Lee - Life of Pi, David O. Russell - Silver Linings Playbook, Steven Spielberg - Lincoln, Benh Zeitlin - Beasts of the Southern Wild

Who Will Win: Steven Spielberg
Who Should Win: a bunch of people not nominated

What a mess. This is the category that might ruin all the work I'm doing to predict these darn awards. At this point, the snubs of Ben Affleck and Kathryn Bigelow are old news. We have to assume that Spielberg will emerge victorious amidst such a directionless (har har) year, but honestly, something super weird could happen here. Ang Lee is probably the most likely sleeper, but Lincoln is the textbook definition of Oscar bait and Spielberg hasn't won since Saving Private Ryan. If I had to pick a personal favorite out of the nominees, I'd go with Haneke, just because he'd probably murder me in my sleep if I didn't. I'm still mad about Bigelow, though.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Simon's Oscar Preview 2013: Special Feature Films

This week's schedule:
Monday - Art & Design, Music
Tuesday - Technical Achievements
Wednesday - Short Films, Special Feature Films
Thursday - Writing & Directing, Acting
Friday - Best Picture

Films I haven't seen are marked accordingly. 

DOCUMENTARY (FEATURE)
Nominees: 5 Broken Cameras, The Gatekeepers (have not seen), How to Survive a Plague, The Invisible War, Searching for Sugar Man

Who Will Win: Searching for Sugar Man
Who Should Win: How to Survive a Plague

Searching for Sugar Man seems to have this one locked up, but there are still some other excellent docs here. How to Survive a Plague and The Invisible War are both effective, emotionally charged films that tackle important topics and benefit from powerful footage and interviews. I have yet to see The Gatekeepers, but reviews have been wildly positive. 5 Broken Cameras is the lone film that doesn't seem capable of carrying its own weight and I would have loved to see The Imposter in its spot instead. Either way, Sugar Man and its manipulative narrative will likely be taking home the award on Sunday. 

FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM
Nominees: Amour, Kon-Tiki, No, A Royal Affair, War Witch

Who Will Win: Amour
Who Should Win: Amour

This may be the most assured victory out of the entire field this year. Amour surprised everyone by hauling in five nominations, in the expected Foreign Language Film category, but also Screenplay, Actress, Director and Best Picture. Amour is a tremendous film and deserves all those accolades, but I do want to draw attention to some of the other worthy competitors from international cinema. No is another excellent film that you should all go see immediately. Even the largely ignored Kon-Tiki is worth a couple hours of your time. The Academy is slowly warming to international cinema and some strong films are getting rewarded as a result. 

ANIMATED FEATURE FILM
Nominees: Brave, Frankenweenie, ParaNorman, The Pirates! Band of Misfits, Wreck-It Ralph

Who Will Win: Wreck-It Ralph 
Who Should Win: Wreck-It Ralph

It's Disney vs. Disney this year, as Brave and Wreck-It Ralph battle it out for the top prize. A few years ago, the idea of Pixar losing this award would have been laughable, but the venerable animation studio has faltered over the past two years. Disney's in-house studio, by contrast, has been picking up steam. Wreck-It Ralph is an adorable, fun and exceedingly intelligent family movie, full of in-jokes and Easter eggs amidst the kinetic animation. I think Ralph is going stomp all over the competition, but Brave is far from dead at this point.

Simon's Oscar Preview 2013: Short Films

This week's schedule:
Monday - Art & Design, Music
Tuesday - Technical Achievements
Wednesday - Short Films, Special Feature Films
Thursday - Writing & Directing, Acting
Friday - Best Picture

Films I haven't seen are marked accordingly.

SHORT FILM (LIVE ACTION)
Nominees: Asad, Buzkashi Boys, Curfew, Death of a Shadow (Dood Van Een Schaduw), Henry

Who Will Win: Curfew
Who Should Win: Death of a Shadow (Dood Van Een Schaduw)

The short films are probably the hardest to predict out of all twenty-four categories. Access can be limited and weighing the public consensus is near impossible. I am fortunate to live in a major city, so every year I get to go to a theater and watch the short film programs in one fell swoop. This year's Live Action shorts weren't the strongest group in recent memory. Death of a Shadow was far and away my personal favorite, starring the excellent Matthias Schoenaerts in a tense, heavily stylized sci-fi thriller. Asad was another standout, but it appears that Curfew is rising to the top of the heap in the eyes of Oscar prognosticators. Many of these films are available through iTunes, thanks to the kind people at Shorts International, and I encourage you all to check them out for yourself.

SHORT FILM (ANIMATED)
Nominees: Adam and Dog, Fresh Guacamole, Head over Heels, Maggie Simpson in "The Longest Daycare", Paperman

Who Will Win: Paperman
Who Should Win: Paperman

Disney's aggressively adorable Paperman must be the heavy favorite here. While none of the other nominees are weak by any stretch of the imagination, the style, story and technical innovations of Paperman are very hard to ignore. In field that feels full of highly accomplished student films, Paperman's overt professionalism and polish makes it stand out. Unlike the other short films, many of these nominees can be easily found with a bit of YouTube hunting. Go! Watch!

DOCUMENTARY (SHORT SUBJECT)
Nominees: Inocente (have not seen), Kings Point (have not seen), Mondays at Racine (have not seen), Open Heart (have not seen), Redemption (have not seen)

Who Will Win: Open Heart
Who Should Win: ?????

So... yeah. I haven't seen a single film nominated in this category. I try very hard each year to see everything up for an Oscar, but the Short Docs got away from me this time around. As such, I'm left with only a handful of unreliable reviews and betting websites for guidance. Thankfully, all of my sources seem to be coalescing around Open Heart, so I'll be putting my money there barring some new developments. Is there some great work hiding here, in plain sight? I have no idea.

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Simon's Oscar Preview 2013: Technical Achievements

This week's schedule:
Monday - Art & Design, Music
Tuesday - Technical Achievements
Wednesday - Short Films, Special Feature Films
Thursday - Writing & Directing, Acting
Friday - Best Picture

Films I haven't seen are marked accordingly. 

FILM EDITING
Nominees: Argo, Life of Pi, Lincoln, Silver Linings Playbook, Zero Dark Thirty

Who Will Win: Argo
Who Should Win: Zero Dark Thirty

Let's not beat around the bush here: I believe Argo will win Best Picture. However, it faces a challenging and potentially historic road to get there, given its lack of a Best Director nomination. One thing that will help it on its way to victory will be picking up key awards, like Best Editing. Although it often gets lost in the shuffle of "those damn technical awards," Editing is closely linked to Best Picture wins, which makes sense when you sit down and think about it. The Academy has surprised us in this category before, but Argo seems like a very safe bet for now. 

CINEMATOGRAPHY
Nominees: Anna Karenina, Django Unchained, Life of Pi, Lincoln, Skyfall

Who Will Win: Life of Pi
Who Should Win: Skyfall

Please, for the love of all that is holy and sacred, can be please give Roger Deakins an award? The veteran cinematographer (nominated here for Skyfall) now has ten frickin' nominations without ever winning an Oscar. He's worked on some of my favorite films of all time, most notable The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, along with most of the Coen brothers' movies. Maybe, just maybe, he can beat out the established favorite, Claudio Miranda for Life of Pi. It would make me so very happy. 

VISUAL EFFECTS
Nominees: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Life of Pi, Marvel's The Avengers, Prometheus, Snow White and the Huntsman

Who Will Win: Life of Pi
Who Should Win: Life of Pi

Have you seen Life of Pi? Have you seen that CGI tiger? It's actually amazing and I totally understand why it will win this category. It's refreshing to see a film that uses visual effects in such an understated and naturalistic way, rather than going for something wildly stylized or aggressively otherworldly. There are plenty of worthy candidates in this field, but Life of Pi and its massively fake tiger should chow down on the other nominees.

SOUND EDITING
Nominees: Argo, Django Unchained, Life of Pi, Skyfall, Zero Dark Thirty

Who Will Win: Skyfall
Who Should Win: Skyfall

Without an aggressive technical juggernaut like last year's Hugo, it appears that the technical awards are going to more spread out than in years past. Hopefully, this will include Skyfall snagging a much-deserved award for Sound Editing. Skyfall is a dense, taut film that benefits immensely from its detailed sound work. As with other categories, I'd be perfectly happy seeing Zero Dark Thirty win some awards, just on principle, but Skyfall is both more likely and more deserving.

SOUND MIXING
Nominees: Argo, Les Misérables, Life of Pi, Lincoln, Skyfall

Who Will Win: Les Misérables
Who Should Win: Skyfall

Okay, fine, I understand. Live singing, yadda yadda yadda. I guess that warrants some level of recognition. I happen to think that Les Mis' sound mixing wasn't always completely successful, but I do have to tip my (almost entirely irrelevant) cap to the ambition and scope of what Tom Hooper & Co. were trying to accomplish. Again, I think the sound work on Skyfall outpaces everything else in the category, but we do not live in a fair world. Perhaps if Tom Hooper zooms in incredibly close on my face and positions me slightly to the right of the frame while I sing, you'll understand my internal emotional state better. 

Monday, February 18, 2013

Simon's Oscar Preview 2013: Music

This week's schedule:
Monday - Art & Design, Music
Tuesday - Technical Achievements
Wednesday - Short Films, Special Feature Films
Thursday - Writing & Directing, Acting
Friday - Best Picture

Films I haven't seen are marked accordingly. 

MUSIC (ORIGINAL SCORE)
Nominees: Anna Karenina, Argo, Life of Pi, Lincoln, Skyfall

Who Will Win: Life of Pi
Who Should Win: Skyfall

A more complicated category than one might assume. Life of Pi, Lincoln and Skyfall have all won awards in various places, but no real consensus has emerged. Alexandre Desplat is only represented here by Argo, but his body of work this year has been phenomenal, highlighted by the sadly missing Zero Dark Thirty score. Lincoln is represented by John Williams, the venerable titan of film composing, but will his understated score be enough? Any of these composers could win, although Life of Pi's Mychael Danna is slowly beginning to pull ahead of the pack on betting sites. The IFMCA Awards on February 21st should shine more light on the subject.

MUSIC (ORIGINAL SONG)
Nominees: "Before My Time" - Chasing Ice (have not seen), "Everybody Needs a Best Friend" - Ted, "Pi's Lullaby" - Life of Pi, "Skyfall" - Skyfall, "Suddenly" - Les Misérables

Who Will Win: "Skyfall" 
Who Should Win: "Skyfall"

Not even close. Adele's powerhouse theme for the new Bond film is leagues ahead of the rest of these tepid nominees. Original Song is always a bizarre category and we all just want to know how the songs are going to get worked into the award show. Will this be a year with dance numbers? An emotive medley? Or will they just play the songs for thirty seconds and move on, like last year? The suspense is killing me, folks! 

Simon's Oscar Preview 2013: Art & Design

Simon's Oscar Blog is back for its third year! As usual, I'll be spending the week breaking down every category in anticipation of the big show this Sunday. We've got a bit of a weird year of nominations on our hands, but I'm doing my best to make sense of it all. Be sure to watch the awards on Sunday to see if I was right.

This week's schedule:
Monday - Art & Design, Music
Tuesday - Technical Achievements
Wednesday - Short Films, Special Feature Films
Thursday - Writing & Directing, Acting
Friday - Best Picture

Films I haven't seen are marked accordingly.

PRODUCTION DESIGN
Nominees: Anna Karenina, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Les Misérables, Life of Pi, Lincoln

Who Will Win: Anna Karenina
Who Should Win: Anna Karenina

We kick things off with Production Design, the Award Formerly Known as "Art Direction." There are three real nominees here: Anna Karenina, Les Misérables and Lincoln. Les Mis may be the safest bet, what with all the costumes and the grime and so forth, but I'm picking Anna Karenina as a slight dark horse winner here. If you haven't seen this movie yet, I urge you to track it down, simply for the design elements. The film as a whole doesn't always cohere, but, my god, the beauty and images they get on screen are jaw-dropping. I'm going to avoid cynicism and guess that the Academy will agree with me here.

COSTUME DESIGN
Nominees: Anna Karenina, Les Misérables, Lincoln, Mirror Mirror, Snow White and the Huntsman

Who Will Win: Anna Karenina
Who Should Win: Anna Karenina

We see many of the same faces here in Costume Design, along with dueling Snow White adaptations. This should be a much clearer Anna Karenina victory, with Keira Knightley's stunning red dress leading the charge. A begrudging nod should also be given to Mirror Mirror, which functions solely as a vehicle for excellent costuming. Finally, the makers of Snow White and the Huntsman get to say they made an Oscar-nominated film. Isn't that adorable?

MAKEUP & HAIR
Nominees: Hitchcock, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Les Misérables

Who Will Win: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
Who Should Win: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

A lightweight category, full of dwarves, Frenchmen and flabby, old men.  No amount of dirt slathered over Hugh Jackman should prevent The Hobbit from winning this one. As for Hitchcock, the Academy is likely too terrified of Anthony Hopkins' quivering jowls to give him the award. I'd have loved to see Looper nominated (and even win) here, but oh well. Time to head into the ol' time machine and change that mistake...

Monday, February 11, 2013

Simon's Oscar Preview 2013: Personal Favorites

We're only a couple weeks away from the Academy Awards! Starting next Monday, I'll be doing my usual breakdown for each category. However, to tide any potential readers over until that point, here's my personal list of favorites from 2012's films. I've seen nearly 80 films released in the last year, giving me a sizable pool to choose from. I would have liked to have seen The Loneliest Planet before posting this list, but we're still working on that one. Anyway, without further ado, Simon's Movie Awards for 2012:

BEST PICTURE
Zero Dark Thirty
  • Django Unchained
  • Holy Motors
  • The Master
  • Moonrise Kingdom
DIRECTOR
Leos Carax – Holy Motors
  • Paul Thomas Anderson – The Master
  • Wes Anderson – Moonrise Kingdom
  • Kathryn Bigelow – Zero Dark Thirty
  • Quentin Tarantino – Django Unchained
ACTOR
Denis Levant – “Mr. Oscar” in Holy Motors
  • Daniel Day-Lewis – “Abraham Lincoln” in Lincoln
  • Joseph Gordon-Levitt – “Joe Simmons” in Looper
  • Joaquin Phoenix – “Freddie Quell” in The Master
  • Jean-Louis Trintignant – “Georges Laurent” in Amour
ACTRESS
Jessica Chastain – “Maya” in Zero Dark Thirty
  • Jennifer Lawrence – “Tiffany Maxwell” in Silver Linings Playbook
  • Emmanuelle Riva – “Anne Laurent” in Amour
  • Quvenzhané Wallis – “Hushpuppy” in Beasts of the Southern Wild
  • Rachel Weisz – “Hester Collyer” in The Deep Blue Sea
SUPPORTING ACTOR
Javier Bardem – “Raoul Silva” in Skyfall
  • Leonardo DiCaprio – “Calvin Candie” in Django Unchained
  • Philip Seymour Hoffman – “Lancaster Dodd” in The Master
  • Tommy Lee Jones – “Thaddeus Stevens” in Lincoln
  • Christoph Waltz – “Dr. King Schultz” in Django Unchained
SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Amy Adams – “Peggy Dodd” in The Master
  • Judi Dench – “M” in Skyfall
  • Ann Dowd – “Sandra” in Compliance
  • Anne Hathaway – “Fantine” in Les Misérables
  • Brit Marling – “Maggie” in Sound of My Voice
SCREENPLAY
Mark Boal – Zero Dark Thirty
  • Paul Thomas Anderson – The Master
  • Wes Anderson & Roman Coppola – Moonrise Kingdom
  • Drew Goddard & Joss Whedon – The Cabin in the Woods
  • Rian Johnson Looper

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

On the Zero Dark Thirty Controversy

Since last week, we've learned a lot about Zero Dark Thirty and the political climate surrounding the film. It appears that there is indeed a faction within the Academy voter base that worked to prevent the film from being nominated and is now working to prevent it from winning any categories (link). All of the complaints center around the issue of torture and the way it is depicted in the film. The film's detractors claim that the film reads as a direct endorsement of torture in the interrogations that led to the capture of Osama bin Laden. Director Kathryn Bigelow has responded with a series of statements (link) defending her film, saying that "depiction is not endorsement."

And so we find ourselves in a huge, media mess. Zero Dark Thirty was seen to have tremendous momentum going into the award season. However, Bigelow's snub among the Academy Award nominations has brought all of that to a screeching halt. Furthermore, we've now seen the Critics' Choice Awards and Golden Globes crown their winners, with Argo taking top honors (as well as Best Director) at both ceremonies. It appears that the perceived momentum was either an illusion or that the film's controversial atmosphere is dividing the various voting bodies.

So, why do I care? Well, I happen to believe that Zero Dark Thirty is the finest piece of American filmmaking released last year. Over 2.5 hours, the film unravels an intensely engaging mystery, guiding the viewer through the ups, downs and endless loopholes required to find a man who was determined to not be found. The film gives us a hero, a woman named Maya, who has dedicated virtually her entire adult life to this one endeavor. The entire thing culminates in an unbelievable raid sequence, executed with no bravado, sensationalism or ra-ra-America bullshit. This movie is high-quality art, folks. However, we should always remember that it is, in fact, a movie. Even with all the research that screenwriter Mark Boal poured into the project, Zero Dark Thirty is a work of fiction. It is not the definitive statement on the actual hunt for bin Laden. The question is: why are so many critics determined to treat it as a documentary?

Earlier today, Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi posted an article titled "'Zero Dark Thirty' Is Osama bin Laden's Last Victory Over America." (link) Even ignoring that absurd, baiting title, I had too many issues with this article to ignore. Chief among them, though, is the following question he poses to Bigelow, in response to her "depiction is not endorsement" statement: "Are audiences not supposed to cheer at the end of the film, when we get bin Laden? They cheered in the theater where I watched it."

I must admit my own biases here: I hate Taibbi's writing. I find him to be a reactionary, sensationalist journalist, who attempts to manipulate his readers into muted outrage. However, even by his usual standards, asking that question is truly ridiculous. I encourage everyone to see the movie, just to understand how off-base that question truly is. The final shot of the film decisively answers that question once and for all.

To me, what writers like Taibbi (and many others in a similar vein) show is that we, as an American people, are not ready to deal with our own recent history. Here are some facts that cannot be denied: we tortured detainees in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. We gathered information that was used to find, assault and kill Osama bin Laden. Whether those two facts are directly related is open to debate, a debate which Zero Dark Thirty makes a point of not answering. However, it appears that viewers and critics are not ready to confront the possibility that, yes, we waterboarding people for information. If this is so morally repellant to Americans that they write columns and petitions decrying a filmmaking who dared suggest such events took place, what kind of culture of denial are we living in? Taibbi talks about America's "brutal, repressive hypocrite underneath" but doesn't seem willing to consider that perhaps, in that statement, he understands the movie even better than he realizes. We really do live in a country where morons on Facebook will write "spoiler alert: we got him" without understanding the full implications.

I urge everyone to see Zero Dark Thirty and ask yourself what is says about America and our own history. Try to leave as much baggage at the door as you can and watch the goddamn movie. If you don't like what you see, perhaps you have yourself to blame.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Making Sense of the 2012 Oscars

If anything was gonna to get me blogging here again, it was gonna be the goddamn Oscars...

I can't even fully explain my obsession with the Academy Awards. Sure, I really, REALLY love movies. That part makes sense. I also love competition and the Oscars give me a fun chance to win things from people foolish enough to bet against me. Above all, I'm obsessed with the way America sells its own culture back to itself. Best Of lists and award shows really intrigue me on those grounds. The Academy Awards are the last relevant American award show with any amount of credibility left. Thus, I've made the following pact: every year, I will watch every film nominated, in every category. Longtime readers will know that this is my third year attempting this.

So, all of this is important because... the Academy Award nominations were announced this morning! I've spent the past several months trying to watch as many relevant movies as I could. I ended up seeing 71% of the non-short films nominated. The Master has eluded me now that it has exited theaters, but all the other missing films are in the Documentary, Foreign or Art categories. This will soon be remedied.

Here's my initial thoughts on the nominations. I'll be back in February to break down each race in detail and announce my own personal favorites from the year's cinema.

-Let's get the big snub out of the way first: Kathryn Bigelow, director of Zero Dark Thirty, only woman to ever win an Academy Award for Best Director. The heavy favorite to win the award going into today. And then... she doesn't get nominated. I'm really at a loss here. There is no precedent for a snub this huge in recent memory. Sure, she's directing a politically charged, controversial movie. Sure, she's a successful woman working in an industry overwhelmingly controlled by men. But this is just inexcusable. I'm not going to quibble with the Academy for not nominating a personal favorite performance or screenplay, but to entirely ignore the director of one of the year's most universally acclaimed films is just a mistake. This is a bad one, guys.

-Amour and Beasts of the Southern Wild both enjoyed surprising amounts of success with Academy voters. Amour has crept out of the Best Foreign Film ghetto to snag Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actress and Best Original Screenplay nominations, all of which I can endorse. Meanwhile, Beasts wrangled up a Best Actress nomination for 9-year-old Quvenzhane Wallis and a Best Director nod for Benh Zeitlin. The Bigelow power vacuum had to filled somehow...

-A few names that ended up falling through the cracks: John Hawkes (Actor, The Sessions), Marion Cotillard (Actress, Rust and Bone) and the entire mess that was Supporting Actor, including both Leonardo DiCaprio and Samuel L. Jackson for Django Unchained and Javier Bardem (Skyfall). Also, Rian Johnson failed to pick up a screenplay nod for Looper.

-I'm thrilled that the Academy avoided The Intouchables for Best Foreign Film. A feelgood French comedy about a crippled man who learns to live again thanks to his lower-class, black assistant, the film's haphazard dance around racial politics isn't nearly worth the acclaim ii got from certain circles. Pleasant surprise in the same category: Kon-Tiki, a fairly wonderful film about a raft full of Norwegians sailing across the Pacific Ocean.

-And so we have a problem on our hands: who the hell is going to win Best Picture? Had you asked me 24 hours ago, I would have said Zero Dark Thirty and then gone searching for cookies. Now, I'm full of confusion and doubt that even cookies can't dispel. Without Bigelow nominated, ZDT's chances have tanked. It's been 23 years since a film won Best Picture without having its director nominated. That was Driving Miss Daisy, generally seen as one of the worst choices in the Academy's voting history. Lincoln appears poised to pick up the pieces, as Steven Spielberg suddenly looks uncontested in the Best Director field. Does that make Lincoln the Best Picture favorite as well? Maybe... but I'm not ready to put my money there yet. Watch the Producer's and Director's Guild Awards this following month. If Zero Dark Thirty can get the predicted wins there, hope may remain.